Friday, December 5, 2014

House on haunted Hill 1999 Remake




IMDb
millionaire offers a group of diverse people $1,000,000 to spend the night in a haunted house with a horrifying past.


Rotten Tomatoes

MOVIE INFO

In this remake of William Castle's campy 1958 classic, an eccentric millionaire named Steven Price invites a diverse group of people to a reputedly haunted mansion that was formerly the site of an insane asylum. Steven offers his guests $1,000,000 each if they can spend the entire night at the old house without fleeing in terror. It sounds simple enough, but when those stories about ghosts haunting the mansion turn out to be true, the guests may no longer opt to stick around. In this version, Steven is played by Geoffrey Rush, and his guests include Jeffrey Combs, Taye Diggs, Peter Gallagher, Chris Kattan, and Bridgette Wilson; Famke Janssen plays Evelyn Price. Sadly, this remake does not feature the original's memorable special-effects gimmick, "Emergo," an inflatable plastic skeleton that rolled on wires through the theater during showings.
Full movie on HDmovie14

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Wyvern




IMDb
  • The residents of a small Alaskan town find themselves under attack by a flying reptile known in medieval mythology as a Wyvern. It has thawed from its ancient slumber by melting icecaps caused by global warming.
    Written by ibigluv33


A wyvern is a cunning dragon of Nordic mythology. It doesn’t breathe fire but is extremely deadly regardless. It loves to swoop down, snatch someone up, and drop what remains of them after its done chowing down. Thanks to rising temperatures, a wyvern has thawed out and taken to making the small hick town of Beaver Mills, Alaska its new feeding ground. You just don’t come across too many Alaskan dragon movies. Regardless, Wyvern is easily the best movie ever made about a dragon attacking Alaska.
Thanks to the near theatrical quality computer effects used to bring it to life, the wyvern ranks as one of the most impressive CGI monsters to ever appear in a Sci-Fi Channel movie. Top notch special effects for a Sci-Fi Channel flick. The rest of the movie isn’t too shabby, either.
Wyvern proves to be a completely unremarkable yet rather well-made straightforward monster movie. It doesn’t bring anything new to the table, outside of a somewhat unique means by which to kill a flying dragon, but it does entertain in a Saturday matinee sort of way without insulting your intelligence the way too many Sci-Fi Channel original movies tend to when they try to be a little too cheeky for their own good. The plot is very reminiscent of Tremors and in that effect, very reminiscent of any number of 1950’s science fiction B-movies. If you like old fashioned monster movies then you’ll probably like this one, too.
A small isolated town filled with average folk and a few colorful bumpkins get cut-off from the outside world thanks to the appearance of a ravaging dragon that procedes to pick-off a few townsfolk before making its way to the heart of the small burg where the remaining townsfolk have to make a stand. The script even takes a page from Jaws by having a local festival those in charge don’t want called off despite the sudden rise in missing citizens and rambling reports of something monstrous on the prowl. Thankfully, the script doesn’t dwell too much on the festival aspect.
Behold the Wyvern!The two main characters are where I had my biggest beef with this dragon tale. No complaints about the actors’ performances; I just found their characters to be a bit too bland and stuffy compared to the folksy charm of most of the supporting players around them. Nick Chinlund (remember him as the bad guy from Ultraviolet? If so, try not to hold it against him) stars as your typical B-movie working class hero who’s contemplating moving away with only his love for a local woman of the generic female lead variety holding him back. Chinlund has a surprisingly serious scene in the third act where he tearfully talks of his guilt regarding his involvement in the incident that claimed his brother’s life. It’s a fairly lengthy scene so heavily dramatic it felt out of place considering mere minutes later we’re going to be watching the same guy in a big rig hauling monster eggs being chased down the street by an angry dragon.
The rest of the cast manages to show just enough personality to make them colorful without going overboard. Well, maybe not Don S. Davis; his performance as a gun-toting kook – this film’s version of Michael Gross’ Tremors character – comes very close to cartoonish buffoonery. The late Davis (in his final role) plays a retired military town crank running around screaming about reptilian invaders just like the ones he helped coverup at Roswell after he spots the wyvern depositing a half eaten moose in his swimming pool.
In what can only be called stunt casting, Barry Corbin of the defunct Alaskan-based drama “Northern Exposure” does his best Wilford Brimley impersonation as an elderly gruff hunter who just happens to be well versed in Nordic monster lore thanks to his Norwegian heritage. I got the impression that somebody on the creative end of Wyvern is a big fan of that series.
Wyvern is more or less Tremors meets “Northern Exposure” but with a flying monster threat, more gore, and less fun. Still, it’ll keep you entertained so long as you go in with no other expectations than to watch a workmanlike creature feature for an hour and a half. Not bad. Not bad at all. Worth a look on a rainy day.
Wyvern also marks the latest chapter in the Sci-Fi Channel’s continuing efforts to make an original movie based over every single monster of myth and legend. They appear to be working their way down the list so if you have a spec script sitting around about an axe-wielding centaur that goes berserk at the Kentucky Derby you might want to contact the Sci-Fi Channel immediately.
Full Movie on PopCornFlix

Prince of Darkness





IMDb
A research team finds a mysterious cylinder in a deserted church. If opened, it could mean the end of the world.



Rotten Tomatoes

MOVIE INFO

Proving that you can never guess what you'll find when you clean out the basement, a man of the cloth discovers that ultimate evil has made a hiding place in his cellar in this tale of terror. Father Loomis (Donald Pleasance) is a priest who discovers a strange object in a church basement -- a canister filled with a swirling and volatile green substance. With the help of Professor Birack (Victor Wong), Loomis discovers the startling truth about his find -- it seems that Satan, who is actually an alien life form, had a son, and the essence of the devil's spawn is trapped inside the canister. The evil spirit has been guarded by a group calling themselves "The Brotherhood of Sleep," but the spirit has the ability to free itself whenever it decides the time is right...and it seems that time is just around the corner. Prince of Darkness was directed by horror master John Carpenter; he also wrote the screenplay under the pseudonym Martin Quatermass.

Full Movie on VideoLinkz

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Death of a Ghost Hunter




IMDb
  • When the Callahans set off for a peaceful family vacation in the mountains they never expected their personal demons to follow them. The children discover a paranormal presence in the secluded cabin and two generations of secrets are revealed, foreverchanging the lives of the living as well as the dead.
    Written by Anonymous

MOVIE INFO

A paranormal investigator determined to prove that there is life after death investigates the house where an unspeakabletragedy occurred in director Sean Tretta's low-budget ghost story. The year was 2002. Carter Simms was a ghost hunter whose meticulous approach to studying the supernatural had earned her a $5000 offer to perform aparanormal investigation of the notorious "Masterson House." Twenty years ago, respected Minister Joseph Masterson, isdevoted wife, and their adorable daughter where ruthlessly slaughtered inside their family abode. To this day, the locals insist that the house where these unspeakable acts occurred is still haunted. After recruiting a videographer, a reporter, and a spiritual advocate to assist the investigation, Simms and her small crew settled prepared to prove once and for all whether "Masterson House" was truly haunted. Three days later, Simms was dead. What sinister events unfolded in that unholy house of death? In this film, viewers are invited to follow along on that fateful investigation and find out firsthand just what awful otherworldy force sent this seasoned ghost hunter to her grave.

Full Movie on OVGuide



What Really Frightens You




IMDb
A mysterious writer working for a monster fanzine asks three New Yorkers what really scares them. After the article is published the primal fears of each interviewee come true. Will they be frightened to death?


BestHorrorMovies
A writer at Ghastly Horror magazine, working under the pseudonym Ghost Writer (Tomaschik), has a great idea for a story. He wants to head out into Times Square and ask people "What Really Frightens You?", then print their answers in his magazine. First, he meets up with Chloe (Sorika), a college student with a fear of ending up stuck in her underwear in public and attacked by sleazy men. Next, he finds Drew (Pringle), a lawyer who is terrified of going back to the inner-city life he's worked so hard to escape and overcome. Finally, he meets Brett (Keveney), a cubicle-dweller who never fully got over his childhood fear of the monster under his bed, still checking there on occasion as an adult. A few days later, the trio's stories published, and they move on with their lives. However, strange things begin to happen. They start hearing and seeing Ghost Writer, only for him to vanish whenever they look again. They start having lucid dreams and hallucinations relating to their greatest fears that grow more and more intense. Soon they realize they'll have to band together to get to the bottom of the mystery before their fears overcome them.

When I first looked at the cast and crew, I was pretty optimistic for What Really Frightens You? given it was directed by Richard W. Haines, director of cult classics like Class of Nuke 'Em High and Splatter University. True to form, I appreciate that the film interestingly has the film quality of a movie that you'd expect to be renting from your local mom and pop video store in the Eighties. There's also some surprisingly effective physical creature effects and great gore that were clearly put together with a lot of care and effort. The main character performances in general are also pretty good (Keveney's screams of terror being a notable exception). Tomaschik, for instance, has an effectively creepy screen presence with his "if-you-squint" Clive Barker look, and the three protagonists are all likeable and believable in their roles (Pringle and Sorika in particular).

Unfortunately, all of the positives in What Really Frightens You? are undermined by a surprisingly slow pace for a sub-80 minute movie, unnecessary and unlikable side characters, and a plot that is explained less and less as the movie goes on to the point where, in the end, the viewer has no idea how or why everything they've seen has happened. First, once our three main protagonists have been interviewed, it takes a surprisingly long time to get all the way through each one's personal warped visions. It's possible this would've worked better as a straight anthology, rather than a film where three people's storylines are occurring at the same time. Drew's story is the most intense of the three, Brett's is the goriest, and, unfortunately for such a good performance, Chloe's "fear" never really rises above being a cheap excuse to get her in her underwear and into a strip club. Each one might be okay if it was told straight through, something seen when the stories start to join together into one tale. As it is, having to jump back and forth hurts the overall product.
Part of the reason it takes so long to move each character along their path is also that each one's story has at least one unnecessary supporting character. Drew has an unlikable Casanova lawyer friend and a "dumb blonde" secretary girlfriend, Chloe has a coworker and a few male friends, and Brett has a coworker he isn't supposed to be dating. NONE of these matter in the overall story, and, with the possible exception of Brett's girlfriend (centerpiece of a nice effect), none are particularly well-acted roles either. They only serve to drag the film out when more tension could be being built instead.

Finally, and most disappointingly, What Really Frightens You? falls apart badly as it winds down. The closer we get to the end, the more the viewer wants to knowwhy this is all happening. Unfortunately, we're never really given an answer. We don't know who Ghost Writer is, why he's doing this or how he's causing it. By the end, I had grown tired of yelling "WHY" and "WHO ARE YOU" at the screen… just in time for a bizarre climax featuring an overlay effect so bad it's almost like it was taken from a different film entirely. I understand what happened in the movie, I just have no idea why.

What Really Frightens You? feels like it should be far better than it is. Its effects work and principal acting are quite good for a low-budget film… yet its overloaded and unexplained story seriously hinders the final product. I've seen that Richard W. Haines has better films in him, though, and still look forward to when that next one comes.

Full Movie on OVGuide

Ominous




IMDb
  • When the Callahans set off for a peaceful family vacation in the mountains they never expected their personal demons to follow them. The children discover a paranormal presence in the secluded cabin and two generations of secrets are revealed, forever changing the lives of the living as well as the dead.
    Written by Anonymous

SYNOPSIS:
When the Callahans travel to the mountains for a summer getaway, their peaceful plans for the weekend are interrupted by supernatural spirits from the past. Mitch (Joseph Anthony Jette) and Christina (Elizabeth Purdy) deal with their personal demons as the their children, Scott (NIck Wolf), Gavin (Sean Patrick Flaherty) and Sara (Melissa Selinas) uncover the paranormal world that surrounds their family’s vacation home. The family must unite to survive.

Full Movie on OVGuide

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Night if the Naked Dead




IMDb
  • Sometimes the Dead have unfinished business. A storm from hell brings mysterious strangers . . . who come with secrets. Emma is a struggling romance writer. David is a traumatized war veteran struggling with his past and sleeping in his van. They face an evil and terrifying menace as the strangers appear. Veronica arrives naked. Coby hasblood on him. Then the Others come. Sex and murder, lust and deadly vengeance make this a night that the romance writer and her new friend will never forget . . . if they survive. Set in an antique house amidst the haunted saltwater marshes of Cape Cod, like the Sixth Sense, the film marries Hitchcock and the paranormal in a tightly plotted thriller.
    Written by Anonymous


Why this film was titled Night of the Naked Dead is totally and completely out of the realm of my understanding. The title certainly indicates nude undead, but there aren’t any naked zombies in the film. For that matter, there really aren’t any actual zombies... I don’t think. The story is so insanely murky it’s actually challenging just following the flow of the picture. Not only are there no naked zombies in this one, there are no clearly defined plot points, everything just blends together in a mess of undeveloped ideas.
Okay, perhaps murky and undeveloped are generous adjectives. This film is a shit storm of the grandest measure. A massive storm sweeps over a small community, suddenly strangers surface with heinous intentions (except... they don’t... really). Are these individuals ghosts? Are they zombies? Are they simply foreign to the location? I’m still not entirely sure. What is obvious is that they’re here to cause trouble. That’s what I can give you of this “story”. These are literally the only areas of the script that seem pronounced.
Night of the Naked Dead knife
According to imdb.com the pic “marries Hitchcock and the paranormal in a tightly plotted thriller.” Way to defecate on the name of a cinematic mastermind, all the while telling an easily observable lie. There’s nothing Hitchcockian about the picture, and the plot is so loosely assembled you could roll a semi right through one of the many holes. The performances aren’t what I’d deem inspired, and the characters themselves are disposable. If not for their miserable personalities and cheesy acting I’d say they’re totally forgettable, unfortunately you may be forced to remember a few of these figures based solely on negative merit.
Night of the Naked Dead impaled
The thing about a micro budget film is there has to be – at the very least – one extremely embraceable quality. Perhaps it’s the performances of the cast, or the quality of the script; special effects can often be well-executed on a paper-thin budget. There’s got to be something to grab, something that makes the viewer say hey, despite the faults of the flick, it had this going for it.Night of the Naked Dead doesn’t leave the audience with any single saving grace. From the opening moments of the production in which we see the worst CGI storm ever shot (it kind of looks like a child splattered a bunch of green and blue finger paint on a massive canvas), to the waning moments that feature a discombobulating “conclusion”, this is a micro flick that sputters, stalls on the tracks and gets T-boned by a freight train. The fact that someone decided to attempt to swindle unsuspecting consumers by attaching the words “of, the” and “dead” is truly deplorable. It’s an insult to genre fans and the kind of maneuver one might expect from Asylum. If your movie sucks with a capitol S, don’t attempt to sell the idea that is bears some form of relation to one of the most cherished and influential franchises in history.
Night of the Naked Dead ghoul
If you enjoy zombie action, don’t watch this movie. If you enjoy spirited low budget horror, don’t watch this movie. If cohesive, well-planned scripts tickle your fancy, don’t watch this movie. If you dig horror flicks that are so bad they're great, don't watch this movie. The sad truth is, there is absolutely no logical reason to waste your time on this disingenuously titled hunk of junk. Night of the Naked Dead is nothing more than 90 minutes of your life that can never again be re-obtained or redeemed. And now I've invested another half hour in writing about the damned thing...


Full Movie on Snag