Saturday, January 4, 2014

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 1974

The Original is usually better




TVGuide Review

TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, THEThere may well be people who haven't seen the original TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE (1974), but they probably don't want to see any CHAINSAW MASSACRE; if they did, multiple copies and sequels are no farther away than the nearest video store. Music video director Marcus Nispel's remake, produced by proud vulgarian Michael Bay, contains just enough pointless "twists" to give the filmmakers an answer to junket roundtable questions like, "What made you want to do a new version of this genre classic?" Like the original, this variation puts four attractive and underdressed young people plus the obligatory ugly friend through blood-spattered hell, but this time around it's as predictable as it is dull. Two couples — sensible Erin and handsome Kemper (Jessica Biel, Eric Balfour) and high-strung Pepper and over-sexed Andy (Erica Leershen, Mike Vogel) — and the inevitable unattached prankster, Morgan (Jonathan Tucker) are driving their van through Texas after a four-day vacation in Mexico. Unbeknownst to the girls, the guys bought two-pounds of marijuana, now hidden in a piƱata. Between horsing around and smoking dope they've gotten themselves off the main road and, in a moment of inattention, nearly run down a young girl walking by the roadside. The girl is obviously traumatized, so they pick her up; she repays their kindness by pulling a gun and blowing out her own brains all over the back of the van. The youngsters stop at a roadside gas station/barbeque restaurant in search of the sheriff, and the sour-faced hag behind the counter tells them to meet him out by some old deserted rust bucket or other. Being good kids, they oblige, and soon find themselves knee-deep in southern-fried psychosis. The Sheriff (R. Lee Ermey) is a redneck sadist, the old man who offers to let Erin use his phone is a vengeful cripple and his son, Leatherface (Andrew Bryniarski), wastes no time skinning Kemper and impaling Andy, alive and blubbering, on a meat hook. Commence the running and screaming. Nispel and Bay hired original cinematographer Daniel Pearl to underlight the film so badly you can't see any of the much ballyhooed new gore effects, and John Laroquette returns to read the film's "based on a true tale" introduction, this time with credit. But unlike Rob Zombie's underrated HOUSE OF 1000 CORPSES (2003) or even the meat-and-potatoes WRONG TURN (2003), this new SAW film is so utterly unimaginative it doesn't even count as hommage; it's just a smudgy copy of a still chilling original.

Roger&Ebert
 
Now here’s a grisly little item. “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” is as violent and gruesome and blood-soaked as the title promises -- a real Grand Guignol of a movie. It’s also without any apparent purpose, unless the creation of disgust and fright is a purpose. And yet in its own way, the movie is some kind of weird, off-the-wall achievement. I can’t imagine why anyone would want to make a movie like this, and yet it’s well-made, well-acted, and all too effective.

The movie’s based on factual material, according to the narration that opens it. For all I know, that’s true, although I can’t recall having heard of these particular crimes, and the distributor provides no documentation. Not that it matters. A true crime movie like Richard Brooks’ “In Cold Blood,” which studies the personalities and compulsions of two killers, dealt directly with documented material and was all the more effective for that. But “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” could have been made up from whole cloth without any apparent difference. No motivation, no background, no speculation on causes is evident anywhere in the film. It’s simply an exercise in terror.
It takes place in an isolated area of Texas, which five young people (one of them in a wheelchair) are driving through in their camper van. They pick up a weirdo hitchhiker who carries hischarms and magic potions around his neck and who giggles insanely while he cuts himself on the hand and then slices at the paraplegic. They get rid of him, so they think.
But then they take a side trip to a haunted-looking old house, which some of them had been raised in. The two girls laugh as they clamber through the litter on the floor, but one of the guys notices some strange totems and charms which should give him warning. They don’t. He and his girlfriend set off for the old swimming hole, find it dried up, and then see a farmhouse nearby. The guy goes to ask about borrowing some gasoline and disappears inside.
His girl gets tired of waiting for him, knocks on the door, and disappears inside, too. A lot of people are going to be disappearing into this house, and its insides are a masterpiece of set decoration and the creation of mood. We see the innocent victims being clubbed on the hand, hung from meat hooks, and gone after with the chain saw.
We see rooms full of strange altars made from human bones, and rooms filled with chicken feathers and charms and weird relics. And gradually we realize that the house is inhabited by a demented family of retarded murderers and grave robbers. When they get fresh victims, they carve them up with great delight. What they do with the bodies is a little obscure, but, uh, they run a barbecue stand down by the road.
One way or another, all the kids get killed by the maniac waving the chain saw -- except one girl, who undergoes a night of panic and torture, who escapes not once but twice, who leaps through no fewer than two windows, and who screams endlessly. All of this material, as you can imagine, is scary and unpalatable. But the movie is good technically and with its special effects, and we have to give it grudging admiration on that level, despite all the waving of the chain saw.
There is, for example, an effective montage of quick cuts of the last girl’s screaming face and popping eyeballs. There are bizarrely effective performances by the demented family (one of them, of course, turns out to be the hitchhiker, and Grandfather looks like Dustin Hoffman in “Little Big Man”). What we’re left with, though, is an effective production in the service of an unnecessary movie.
Horror and exploitation films almost always turn a profit if they’re brought in at the right price. So they provide a good starting place for ambitious would-be filmmakers who can’t get more conventional projects off the ground. “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” belongs in a select company (with “Night of the Living Dead” and “Last House on the Left”) of films that are really a lot better than the genre requires. Not, however, that you’d necessarily enjoy seeing it.

full movie on PutLocker

No comments:

Post a Comment